Meraki 67 Port Forwarding for DVR

Solved
MicahLackey
Conversationalist

Meraki 67 Port Forwarding for DVR

I am very new to this process and could use some help!!

 

I was following the instructions from https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/NAT_and_Port_Forwarding/Port_Forwarding_and_NAT_Rules_on_the_MX

 

When I try to put "Any"  under Allowed IP's and try to save I get an "error saving page"

 

 

MicahLackey_0-1669906582569.png

 

I have a CBS350 connected to this and have set up port 18 with a lan ip and need to know how to point this rule there

 

Thanks

 

1 Accepted Solution
MicahLackey
Conversationalist

Thanks, everyone for the  replies. I found out that my access rights were not set correctly

View solution in original post

5 Replies 5
alemabrahao
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

There is no secret:

 

alemabrahao_0-1669906984834.png

 

I am not a Cisco Meraki employee. My suggestions are based on documentation of Meraki best practices and day-to-day experience.

Please, if this post was useful, leave your kudos and mark it as solved.
MicahLackey
Conversationalist

That is what I did but I get an error message and it will not save. Now this is a Lorex dvr model LH118000. that wants to use port 80 but I am changing to 8080 and it also uses 9000. I know there is an issue with using 80 and that is the reason for change

alemabrahao
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

I suggest you open a support case.

I am not a Cisco Meraki employee. My suggestions are based on documentation of Meraki best practices and day-to-day experience.

Please, if this post was useful, leave your kudos and mark it as solved.
PhilipDAth
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

Can you post a screenshot of your configuration and error when saving it?

 

Make sure you have filled out all the fields.  Make sure the local IP address belongs to a local network on the MX.

MicahLackey
Conversationalist

Thanks, everyone for the  replies. I found out that my access rights were not set correctly

Get notified when there are additional replies to this discussion.