Seems I have a lot of questions today. Here is an explanation of one of my setups.
I have a pair of MX100 at one of our sites. We have two internet services at that site. Verizon and Comcast. The MX100's are setup as active/passive. Warm spare mode. Both devices internet ports go to the Verizon modem. Both devices port 2 (WAN2) go to the Comcast modem. Here is an example of what that looks like with example LAN IP's given by the respective modems.
MX100 Primary
Internet port 10.157.2.50 //Verizon
Port 2 10.1.10.50 //Comcast
MX100 Spare
Internet port 10.157.2.51 //Verizon
Port 2 10.1.10.51 //Comcast
Support suggested that the best practice would be to setup a Virtual IP (VIP) for the pair to avoid having flow issues upstream at the modems. So I setup those like this as an example.
10.157.2.10
10.1.10.10
The question I have is if I need to create a 1:1 NAT on the modems from the WAN IP to the above virtual IP's or if I rely on the modem being VPN friendly and creating the dynamic NATs. Sorry if I've used some incorrect terminology along the way but I'd be happy to clarify if any questions arise.
My goal is to have the Non Meraki VPN peers that I connect to, to only have two public IPs from which my devices would establish tunnels from. The Verizon and the Comcast public IPs.
Adam R MS | CISSP, CISM, VCP, MCITP, CCNP, ITILv3, CMNO
If this was helpful click the Kudo button below
If my reply solved your issue, please mark it as a solution.