@MerakiDave wrote:
Yes, this is the correct behavior, sorry if it's not obvious from the description or documentation. If you want to capture the first 30 packets of a particular sequence, and you apply a filter, and also tell it to stop capturing after 30 packets... If there are then more than 30 packets before the sequence of interest, you'll miss it. As you stated, the 'X' packets counter is prior to any filtering.
This is a problem well known to Data Scientists and Informaticists. The better tools allow one to process / filter until the (desired) number of data items of interest has been collected. This is pretty basic stuff. Along with not creating dashboards that make the more numerate chortle.
I'm also tired of seeing a number series sorted alphabetically (0, 1, 10, ..... 19, 2, 20, 21).
Please employ more Data Scientists.