https://api.meraki.com/api/v1/organizations/15*****565/devices/uplinksLossAndLatency . One of our customers is trying to get performance data from this endpoint and getting errors like these in the responses. We are looking for networkIDs and we are getting this "networkId":"* TLSv1.3 (IN), TLS app data, [no content] (0):L_8134*********!234" {"ts":"20* TLSv1.3 (IN), TLS app data, [no content] (0): This is failing our collections . Question is if such data is expected in responses or Is it pointing out issues with the devices in play? What would be a resolution for such errors ? Do we regex for expected data within responses or instruct the customers to verify the devices for TLS issues?    ... View more

Hello Meraki team,     Firstly thanks for super quick accurate responses for our prior questions. Its very helpful.   We need to find out WAN Bandwidth utilisation and WAN Bandwidth Utilisation percentage . Assuming the following are the best API endpoints for our requirement https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/#!get-network-appliance-uplinks-usage-history   https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/#!get-organization-appliance-uplinks-usage-by-network   Considering the rate limiting ,the org level calls makes sense to us. The Org level call https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/#!get-network-appliance-uplinks-usage-history  however states that "if more than one device was active during the specified timespan, then the sent and received bytes will be aggregated by interface."   1) If there are two devices active in any timespan say , wan1 and wan2 does this org level endpoint display both the interfaces say Wan 1 and wan 2   but the data for those will be from both devices aggregated? OR does it mean that there will always be a Single Interface wan1 OR wan2 in the response with an aggregated value . We dont have a multiple wan active setup so its hard to find out.    2) Could you please validate our formulas for Wan bandwidth utilisation WAN bandwidth utilization ( in kbps) = Sent Bytes( or Received Bytes) / 125  * resolution For bandwith util % we intend to use the endpoint - https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api/get-network-appliance-traffic-shaping-uplink-bandwidth/ WAN1/Wan2 bandwidth utilisation percentage = WAN bandwidth utilization(in kbps) /  Banwidth Limits for WAN (in kbps) 3) Is there any API endpoint that gives us the Availability of a WAN circuit ? Or is there any way to find out about WAN circuits ?   ... View more

We are using this endpoint for one of our solutions -/api/v1/organizations/{organizationId}/uplinksLossAndLatency Sometimes the uplink value shows "NULL" . It possibly means that the uplink port is down or failed over but there are performance metrics still alive. For instance { "networkId": "L_647955396387936173", "serial": "Q2QN-SJJP-8KA7", "uplink": null, "ip": "10.2xx.2.1x", "timeSeries": [ { "ts": "2020-11-13T17:58:45Z", "lossPercent": 0.0, "latencyMs": 125.0 }, { "ts": "2020-11-13T17:59:44Z", "lossPercent": null, "latencyMs": null }, { "ts": "2020-11-13T18:00:44Z", "lossPercent": 100.0, "latencyMs": 0.0 }, { "ts": "2020-11-13T18:01:44Z", "lossPercent": null, "latencyMs": null }, { "ts": "2020-11-13T18:02:44Z", "lossPercent": null, "latencyMs": null } ] }   I presume this means we could ignore this Uplink port and not act on it ? Just needed clarification on this    Question 1: - what does a NULL uplink value in perf stats endpoint really mean and could we ignore the stats when its NULL   also request some clarifications on the following results.   Few of the uplink stats results from the `uplinksLossAndLatency` end point have the same IP but different uplinks and serial numbers   "networkId": "L_647955396387935591",     "serial": "Q2QN-L75M-VXN3",<---     "uplink": "wan1",     "ip": "192.84.xx.11",     "networkId": "L_647955396387935591",     "serial": "Q2QN-L75M-VXN3",     "uplink": "wan2",     "ip": "192.84.xx.11",         "networkId": "L_647955396387935591",     "serial": "Q2QN-Z7PG-E3DF",<---     "uplink": "wan2",     "ip": "192.84.xx.11",     "networkId": "L_647955396387935591",     "serial": "Q2QN-Z7PG-E3DF",     "uplink": "wan1",     "ip": "192.84.xx.11",""   xx are al the same above and some results have same Uplink name and Serial number but different IP addresses   { "networkId": "L_647955396387936173", "serial": "Q2QN-6QQK-J2L5", <- "uplink": "wan1", <- "ip": "182.74.17.1",<-----------------------IP1----------- "timeSeries": [ { "ts": "2020-11-13T17:58:16Z", "lossPercent": 0.0, "latencyMs": 45.2 },  ] } { "networkId": "L_647955396387936173", "serial": "Q2QN-6QQK-J2L5",<- "uplink": "wan1", <- "ip": "182.74.17.147",<-----------------------IP2----------- "timeSeries": [ { "ts": "2020-11-13T17:58:16Z", "lossPercent": 0.0, "latencyMs": 46.5 },] }   Question 2: What is the relationship between serial number , IP and uplink name . We know uplink values could be only the follow 4 values- wan1 , wan2 , cellular and NULL. but unsure on when the two possible cases mentioned above occur. (same uplink/serial , diff IP and same ip , diff uplink/serial)   Thanks for your time . ... View more