The Meraki Community
Register or Sign in
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • About antricc
antricc

antricc

Here to help

Member since Mar 2, 2023

‎03-17-2023
Kudos from
User Count
cmr
Kind of a big deal cmr
2
View All
Kudos given to
User Count
cmr
Kind of a big deal cmr
1
RaphaelL
Kind of a big deal RaphaelL
1
View All

Community Record

5
Posts
2
Kudos
0
Solutions

Badges

First 5 Posts
Lift-Off View All
Latest Contributions by antricc
  • Topics antricc has Participated In
  • Latest Contributions by antricc

Re: Load Balancing With 2 MXs and 2 Internet Connections

by antricc in Security / SD-WAN
‎03-03-2023 02:22 PM
2 Kudos
‎03-03-2023 02:22 PM
2 Kudos
I will be needing the extra SFP in the main stack, two MS-410-16 will do the trick as I won't be needing the extra SFP+. Thanks for all the feedback! ... View more

Re: Load Balancing With 2 MXs and 2 Internet Connections

by antricc in Security / SD-WAN
‎03-03-2023 10:36 AM
‎03-03-2023 10:36 AM
I did mention the 425 but am thinking it may be a little overkill for my application. What do you think about this... I am wondering if 2 MS410-16 would be the best option for the core layer. I already have 2 of each MX250 and MS350, 250, 225 in my MDF with most ports on the MS's already taken up. I would create three stacks from each model MS to serve the access layer with redundant and possibly aggregated 1g links to each MS410. The remaining 4 sfp+ will connect my branch locations.   The redundant MX is something I am still unsure how to implement while keeping both internet connections load balancing. Is it possible to run a spare MX with no active uplinks so in case of a failure I could quickly swap the cables from one MX to the other? I can't afford the extra circuit to keep internet access to both MXs which seems to be my only option if I am required to load balance my two existing internet connections. ... View more

Re: Load Balancing With 2 MXs and 2 Internet Connections

by antricc in Security / SD-WAN
‎03-02-2023 03:28 PM
‎03-02-2023 03:28 PM
I like this idea but should have mentioned that I would eventually like to see redundant or aggregated links to each branch since the fiber will already be there, this would be a minimum of 12sfp ports in the core. I might be wrong but I think a stack of 3 350s would still have less switching capacity than one 425. Do you think having the redundancy at the core while still having a single point of failure due to my MX would be my best route or would you say having the single MX defeats the purpose of the 350 stack?  ... View more

Re: Load Balancing With 2 MXs and 2 Internet Connections

by antricc in Security / SD-WAN
‎03-02-2023 12:30 PM
‎03-02-2023 12:30 PM
Thanks for the reply! I am far from a network engineer but have been tasked with configuring a campus to support 4 spoke locations from the internet connections terminating at our hub location. I may be overthinking the redundancy of it all but would really love to avoid any outages while staying within budget. I will attach a quick topology I drafted up to see if anyone notices any oversights on my part, the topologies of the spoke locations are not detailed or finalized. Keep in mind that we simply do not have the budget to implement redundant aggregation switches.   ... View more

Load Balancing With 2 MXs and 2 Internet Connections

by antricc in Security / SD-WAN
‎03-02-2023 10:30 AM
‎03-02-2023 10:30 AM
From what I can tell, load balancing between two internet connection is only supported when both uplinks are connected to a single MX. I am in a spot where the internet funding for my two internet connections relies on them being used concurrently. I am trying to avoid a single point of failure and would like to have two MXs each with a single internet connection that load balance my internet traffic, I think this would be more along the lines of GLBP but meraki seems to take a VRRP approach which does not allow for load balancing. Is there a way to implement load balancing between two MXs?? Any suggestions or questions are appreciated! ... View more
Labels:
  • Labels:
  • Firewall
Kudos from
User Count
cmr
Kind of a big deal cmr
2
View All
Kudos given to
User Count
cmr
Kind of a big deal cmr
1
RaphaelL
Kind of a big deal RaphaelL
1
View All
My Top Kudoed Posts
Subject Kudos Views

Re: Load Balancing With 2 MXs and 2 Internet Connections

Security / SD-WAN
2 319
View All
Powered by Khoros
custom.footer.
  • Community Guidelines
  • Cisco Privacy
  • Khoros Privacy
  • Privacy Settings
  • Terms of Use
© 2023 Meraki