I am currently having an issue with the static routes and maybe I am misunderstanding.  On the Meraki MX, I have a subnet for example 192.168.200.0/24 VLAN 10 by default it will go out the WAN to do whatever it needs to do. Now, let's say I need it to go another way when the traffic has a certain destination in which would be a Cisco Catalyst Switch. I would like this to be on the WAN Port and let's say that WAN port IP is 192.168.100.1 and the IP on that switch is 192.168.100.2.  I try to create a static route such as 192.168.200.0/24 next hop 192.168.100.2 and it won't let me then let's say on the Cisco Catalyst I would do the same thing but the next hop would be 192.168.100.1. Is there something I am missing? What would be the best way to go about this? Should I not put that switch on the WAN port and put it behind the firewall instead and attach it to a different VLAN? Then just set static routes on the catalyst? Any help would be appreciated. Error: Static lan route subnets cannot be contained by (or be equal to) a VLAN subnet ... View more

Good morning everyone,   I have some questions regarding Meraki L3 switches.   Long story short, I need some guidance since this has been one difficult route. I have MS250 L3 switches that all need to talk together.   4 of the switches are in the core and they're stacked together running OSPF 0 for the area. All the other locations are trunked back to the stacked switches via SMF fiber.   For those branch locations, should the OSPF be a different area or can they all be apart of the same area? Also, when it comes to VLANs, lets say VLAN 50 is on one of the branch switches with an interface of 10.0.50.1. Does the spot they go back to need to also have a VLAN interface in order to work properly and if so, why? We have one interface which is a management interface which isn't relayed but the other VLANs that are specifically for there location are being relayed back to the stack where they receive DHCP.  Also, with OSPF at the branch locations. Do I need to configure static routes or can this be disregarded and just allow OSPF to do it all? ... View more