Hi, Has anyone here seen high "Device Utilization" with the Organisation>Summary Report especially with the mx400? What are your experiences? We have a pair of MX400 which are used only as a wireless concentrator and t he "Device Utilization" graph has grown to a consistent 85-90%. We have also been seeing unwanted failover events (VRRP failovers) and are obviously suspicious of the CPU usage causing it. BUT TAC has investigated and advised the actual device load is not high very high and not to worry about it. They provided the following for our CPU load. > Load 1.24(1 min) 1.17(5 min) 1.06(15 min) "Since it is a quad-core CPU, if the load reaches 4.00 reaches 100% which would cause some performance issues. However, the actual load on primary is just around 1.00, so it should not be a problem at this moment." The Meraki docs on Load monitoring say the device utilisation is "calculated based upon the CPU utilization of the MX and it's traffic load.". Why is there such a disconnect between the Utilisation graph and the CPU load that Meraki TAC can see? Should we just be ignoring the u tilisation graph? Am I missing something?
... View more