The Meraki Community
Register or Sign in
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • About jptagana
jptagana

jptagana

Here to help

Member since Mar 9, 2022

‎03-29-2023
Kudos given to
User Count
PhilipDAth
Kind of a big deal PhilipDAth
2
JessIT1
JessIT1
1
Arthur-BH
Arthur-BH
1
m_Andrew
Meraki Employee m_Andrew
1
View All

Community Record

5
Posts
0
Kudos
0
Solutions

Badges

5th Birthday
First 5 Posts
Lift-Off View All
Latest Contributions by jptagana
  • Topics jptagana has Participated In
  • Latest Contributions by jptagana

Re: Virtual IP can't be ping but Physical IP can be ping.

by jptagana in Switching
‎09-15-2022 03:29 AM
‎09-15-2022 03:29 AM
@PhilipDAthyou are correct the Meraki support suggest to enable "flood unknown multicast" because the traffic is not leaving the local switch (server farm switch) where the IPTV switch is connected. The support told me that the other switches doesn't know about that multicast traffic so the only solution is to flood the traffic.   Btw, NLB VIP is already set to Multicast with IGMP.   Thanks for your time! *cheers*   ... View more

Re: Virtual IP can't be ping but Physical IP can be ping.

by jptagana in Switching
‎09-13-2022 10:55 PM
‎09-13-2022 10:55 PM
@PhilipDAththank you for your inputs I think this is the culprit.   with regards to method used to provide virtual IP, I'm not sure what the IPTV guy configured in his server but I knew he is using a Windows 2019 and the virutal IP is used for NLB.   But he is totally disagreeing that the issue is from his side or let say from our side as you told Meraki can not do static ARP configuration. But funny thing is the same setup we did in other customers with the same IPTV company and the setup is working fine.   I will open a case now with Meraki support and we'll see what will be their input. ... View more

Re: Virtual IP can't be ping but Physical IP can be ping.

by jptagana in Switching
‎09-13-2022 08:55 AM
‎09-13-2022 08:55 AM
there is no route in the core switch all vlan l3 interfaces are configured in the MX, strange why the physical IP is reachable from the core switch and edge switches and only the virtual IP from the server is not but in server farm switch I can ping both virtual and physical IPs.   I will prepare the topology and share it here.   Thanks! ... View more

Virtual IP can't be ping but Physical IP can be ping.

by jptagana in Switching
‎09-13-2022 08:02 AM
‎09-13-2022 08:02 AM
We are doing a IPTV network setup, the guy from IPTV company setup their server and connected to a third-party switch (Aruba) and connected to our Server Farm switch MS210 via a trunk port and all the vlans are tagged.   The issue is, the IPTV server has a virtual IP of 192.168.182.4 Ping from the server farm switch (MS210) - getting a reply Ping from the core switch (MS410) or other edge switches (MS210) - not getting a reply Ping other IPs (physical IPs from the same server) - getting a reply   All uplinks from Server Farm Switch to Core Switch to Edge Switches are configured as trunk port and allowed vlan "all".   Note: We have MX250 but no firewall rule configured.     Thanking you in advance...           ... View more
Labels:
  • Labels:
  • Layer 2

Re: Webroot AMP

by jptagana in Security / SD-WAN
‎07-26-2022 11:58 PM
‎07-26-2022 11:58 PM
We have received the same from our customers. Is this really safe? ... View more
Kudos given to
User Count
PhilipDAth
Kind of a big deal PhilipDAth
2
JessIT1
JessIT1
1
Arthur-BH
Arthur-BH
1
m_Andrew
Meraki Employee m_Andrew
1
View All
Powered by Khoros
custom.footer.
  • Community Guidelines
  • Cisco Privacy
  • Khoros Privacy
  • Privacy Settings
  • Terms of Use
© 2023 Meraki