Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About ShubhamPatki
ShubhamPatki
New here
Member since Nov 9, 2021
Nov 16 2021
Community Record
3
Posts
0
Kudos
0
Solutions
Nov 16 2021
7:51 AM
Hello all, so we are have multiple switches connected to each other, currently these switches are connected to each other with redundancy, but the LACP is not configured yet. So basically the STP has disabled all the duplicate links between the switches. Our objective is to use these duplicate links that are in blocked state by putting them in aggregation. Now according to the documentation, both the links should be disconnected from the switch before the LACP config is made. My query is how would we even make the change to the LACP config if we just simply remove the only uplinks on the switch locking us out of that particular switch we intend to make the change on in the first place. I checked if the local config page has the option to make the LACP changes but wasnt able to find the same. I am opening a TAC case soon, but still any thoughts would be welcome. TIA.
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Layer 2
Nov 16 2021
7:40 AM
Hello Karstenl, Thanks for the info. I got in touch with the support and they are saying that the only workaround to achieve this without disturbing the template is to use their backdoor help. They have the ability to mark individual networks/switches to the desired version apart from the template. We will be going by that route I guess. As splitting the template for individual network kind of creates extra unnecessary confusion and complexion I think. Thanks for your thought though. It was very helpful.
... View more
Nov 9 2021
4:19 AM
Hello all, I have to upgrade Firmware on the Switches in the network. The thing is all the networks are attached to a template. We plan to do a staged approach as upgrading 100+ switches at the same time won't be possible. I believe that unbinding a network, then upgrading and then binding it back should work. Is there a document that can confirm this? Or any other way we can do a distributed approach as I can not select the devices individually to schedule the upgrades. TIA.
... View more
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
