I think you need a little context friend, no idea what are you referring to. ... View more

Sorry Dave I'll be blunt and short as I honstly thing you're avoiding the point here.  If you advertise it supports 160mhz channel but the development team for any reason decided it's not worth testing and worse, deploying that (160mhz existed & was used by me back on LInksys AC3200 - this is double the age of that post if not older) - It wasn't the most stable (home environment I know) but it existed.  Currently on Wifi6 Router at home - using 160Mhz - it just works, coverage, stability and speed (even though its theoretical - it's amazing to see 2.5GBPS wireless speeds! ) So why on earth WHY?? You advertise 160mhz, which is what actually provides those theoretical speeds that are part of the advertisement (AX3000\AX1800) if in actual, no one can reach over 866mbps over wifi????? CAN YOU SEE HOW WRONG IT IS? I'm sorry, as a customer - this is false advertising mate. you say you're giving us speeds and what not, while actually, "it's more of a headache", Really?? but it wasn't a headache to put it down in the advertisement so everyone will buy it.  Come on Dave. I think customers deserve a better answer, or better yet. a solution.   Thanks. ... View more

I agree with you completely mate.  Yet having an access point that is capable of doing more (and is advertised as one) yet not allow whoever purchases those AP the ability to test and see if it works well or is causing more issues than it should (which just means it shouldn't be integrated inside the AP in the first place - but that's a whole different story)    I think it's our right as customers.  a small analogy to it:  purchasing a phone that is said to have 5x optical zoom - but because it may look blurry on the edges the company decided to disable the zoom feature entirely - can you see the equivalent point of view here? ... View more

@MerakiDave Hi Dave It's 2021 - Wifi 6 is pretty much a standard in the market now. It has such a better speed & stability improvements when handling large amounts of data transfers WHY is it not on the dashboard yet??  Inside an office where it can be used to help employees transfer large amounts of data to nas unit instead of being chained to cables is such a huge improvement!  Can we do something about it please?? Sorry I'm being so blunt, but this is some serious bad false advertising if Cisco is promoting products for 160Mhz capable devices yet they are not actually enabling users to use it.  Not to mention this is 2 years old+ Topic. WHY???? btw - Just started using MR44 here looks promising, I want to get everyone to work wirelessly as possible, and this seems like a show stopper to me. Looking forward to hear your thoughts about this. ... View more