Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Register or Sign in
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About Fernando_R
Fernando_R
Comes here often
Member since Sep 15, 2020
Apr 13 2023
Community Record
14
Posts
0
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
Mar 20 2023
8:08 AM
OK, this is what doesn't work. It does allow to set it on different SSIDs, but it only works on the first one.
... View more
Mar 20 2023
5:23 AM
That is incorrect. If you follow the message thread, you will see that the first time, the limit was applied to the HOME SSID and it didn't work. Then I applied it on the first Paseo-Colon SSID, and on this one it did work, while on the HOME SSID it still doesn't work, even though it is applied. I left the speedburst checked, to carry out other tests, after it worked on the SSID of PASEO-COLON, not before.
... View more
Mar 16 2023
12:51 PM
Not for this test, because the speed burst generates speed spikes higher than the limit applied in the traffic shaping.
... View more
Mar 15 2023
1:53 PM
Hello. I have updated my MR42 to its latest version 29.5.1. After creating my RF profile, I have decided to limit the BW of my clients connected to the SSID HOME to 5Mbps. When performing the tests on this limit, the result was not what was expected and it did not restrict the traffic as configured. After several tests I have noticed that this feature only works on the first configured SSID, in this case it is the one called Paseo Colon. Has this happened to anyone else?
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
SSID
Jan 25 2023
8:23 AM
It's an option, but it was mentioned a while ago that this could come at a cost.
... View more
Jan 25 2023
8:16 AM
Thanks to both! The access will not be via anyconnect, but native VPN of the device that the user has. Would it still work with Radius? I cannot force a client to have Radius, but I can propose it, although I find the change difficult. It should be resolved by Meraki.
... View more
Jan 25 2023
7:01 AM
It is not possible to do this. When trying, meraki will throw an error. For VPN clients, you must assign a different segment than the one already configured for the LAN.
... View more
Jan 25 2023
6:58 AM
I would like to know if anyone is trying to validate VPN clients (SSL) in an MX with an AD, assigning permissions according to the profile configured in the AD? In the Meraki documentation, it is stated that this would not be possible, which suggests to me a very important security vulnerability, once a client is connected.
Is it possible to link the AD configuration carried out in the VPN clients section with the policy profiles in the AD section?
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
ACLs
-
Client VPN
-
Firewall
-
Other
Jan 24 2023
9:33 AM
What is the point of using AD for VPN clients, otherwise it does not allow me to use the security policies applied to each group? This is a security bug, that any VPN user can access the content of the entire network. There is no way to apply restrictions for VPN clients? What does @Meraki say about all this?
... View more
Oct 5 2021
3:39 PM
Users receive IP and navigation is enabled, they can access the Internet. I understand that it may be an issue of ports to enable, and that is why I ask if both with teams and with zoom, someone could solve this.
... View more
Oct 5 2021
2:39 PM
HELLO, I WANT TO KNOW IF ANYONE HAD THE NEED TO DENY ALL OUTGOING TRAFFIC TO THE INTERNET AND ALLOW ONLY THE MICROSOFT TEAMS AND ZOOM APPLICATION. I TRIED TO DO IT WITH A GROUP POLICY, BUT I STILL CANNOT ACCESS THE APPS.
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
ACLs
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
