Meraki

shawn001 · ‎Aug 1 2020

Thanks for your response, progress has been made. Device successfully connected as VPN concentrator. Auto-VPN status is green, VPN Registry: Connected, NAT type : Friendly, and Encrypted However site-to-site peer status/connectivity is red, usage : none , 0ms Modify the upstream route couple times, there is something missing. kindly point me in the right direction, correct route statement or use ospf Thanks in advance

shawn001 · ‎Jul 18 2020

Thank you articles are really helpful. To your response "install a pair of warm spare MX units in your DC configured as AutoVPN hubs" of the following scenarios listed in the first document, which one is most favorable in this case? • MX at the datacenter deployed as a one-armed concentrator • Warm spare/High Availability at the datacenter • OSPF route advertisement for scalable upstream connectivity to connected VPN subnets • Datacenter redundancy • Split tunnel VPN from the branches and remote offices • Dual WAN uplinks at all branches and remote offices Thanks again.

shawn001 · ‎Jul 17 2020

Existing infrastructure comprises of two Hub routers in the DC and there about 100+ spoke router spread across states. The DMVPN solution for these cisco devices work great, however we bringing in the Meraki MX64 to replace the spoke router. Couple questions: 1. What is the best design and security practice to implement meraki into a cisco environment ? 2. Tried setting up Auto-VPN with the Cisco (Hub) router - DMVPN IKEv1&2 and no luck, has everyone done this ? 3. Is Passthrough or VPN Concentrator mode an option in this case? Any suggestions would be appreciated. thanks! Please feel free to share a diagram and explanation, as I am new to Meraki products.

Meraki

Community

About shawn001

shawn001

Community Record

Badges

Re: Meraki + DMVPN

Re: Meraki + DMVPN

Meraki + DMVPN