Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Become a member of the Cisco Meraki Community today
Get answers from our community of experts in record time.
Join now- About Ste
About Ste
Ste
Comes here often
Member since Apr 21, 2020
Online
Community Record
14
Posts
0
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
yesterday
after rebooting core-02 when I try to set VRRP on the interfaces without the preferred uplink flag, I receive the message: "Default Gateway can only be set if the interface is designated as the V4 uplink." Could you please provide any insights or suggestions on how to resolve this issue?
... View more
yesterday
If i check on CLI the show vrrp I've results only on the Primary core switch, for spare no output: ------------------------- SW-CORE-01#show vrrp Vlan10 - Group 10 - Address-Family IPv4 State is MASTER State duration 39.635 secs Virtual IP address is 10.80.10.1 Virtual MAC address is 0000.5E00.010A Advertisement interval is 1000 msec Preemption enabled Priority is 100 State change reason is VRRP_PRIORITY Master Router is 10.80.10.2 (local), priority is 100 Master Advertisement interval is 1000 msec (expires in 798 msec) Master Down interval is 3609 msec FLAGS: 1/1 SW-CORE-01# -------------------------------- SW-CORE-02#show vrrp SW-CORE-02#
... View more
Monday
What do you mean with: configured as Layer 3 gateways in the same network? do I need to configure something on the backup switch about?
... View more
Monday
on this link Cloud Configuration: Release Versions and Highlights - Cisco Meraki Documentation I see that for 17.18.2 is supported. can you confirmed?
... View more
Monday
Dear Community, I am currently facing some confusion regarding the configuration of the VRRP mode on two C9300 IOS-XE 17.18.2 switches that are cloud-native and connected by a fiber link. Here is my current setup: I have designated one of the C9300 switches as the master, with a static IP and preferred uplink configured. Following the guide "Cloud-Managed Switching Warm Spare (VRRP) Overview - Cisco Meraki Documentation" from the Cisco Meraki Documentation, I enabled the warm spare on the master C9300 and created the VLANs with the VRRP option flagged. Additionally, I configured the virtual IP and group ID. Despite saving the configuration without encountering any errors or warnings, I noticed that no IPv4 VIP is displayed on the Routing and DHCP Interfaces page. I have repeated this process several times, but the outcome remains the same. What might be missing in my configuration? About the VLAN IPs for the backup VRRP C9300, do I need to configure these as well? Thank you in advance for your help! Best regards,
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Layer 3
Nov 5 2025
1:16 AM
Dear Community, I've organization with two networks with only MX installed (no Switch, no Access Point ecc.). The inventory is correctly list only the MXs. On the Organization -> Firmware upgrade menu the system report criticals for: Wireless, Cellular gateway, Switch and Camera even if no one of that are in the inventory or installed. Why this appen? Is there any option to set the Firmware status only for the inventory devices? We monitor the Firmware upgrade status with API and this behavior generate many false-positive alerts. Thank you
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Administrators
-
Firmware upgrades
-
Inventory
Dear community, I have 2x C9300-24T-M stacking configuration running CS 17.1.4 and the system propose upgrade to CS 172.2.3 and also upgrade to the IOS-XE. I've read this Important Update for Organizations with Devices on CS Firmware - The Meraki Community. and I know about the Cloud-native ios xe new features introduction. My questions are: is it mandatory migrate from CS to IOS-XE if we don't need the new features? The C9300-24T-M can still running the CS firmware for the next years or there's a end of support date about CS on 9300-M series? Thank you
... View more
Apr 1 2025
2:16 AM
@jimg3 with this deployment as Routed Mode what about the Deploying Highly Available vMX ? is there enabling for a new schenarios ? thank you
... View more
Mar 26 2025
3:57 AM
that's a super new!! @jimg3 is there any chance to convert the existing vMX from Passthrough to Routed in a easy way or is needed to delete vMX and deploy again from scratch? thank you
... View more
Oct 21 2024
5:58 AM
Dear @PhilipDAth any new about early access for this features? is something that we are looking forward. thank you
... View more
Oct 21 2024
1:02 AM
Hi @PaulF, I'm testing Trusted Access and it is ok for IOS device but if I try to use it with a windows machine Intune Joined is not possible because Trusted Access for windows now requre Registering the Device but device isjust registered under Intune. Is there any chance to have Trusted Access working with Intune registered devices? thank you
... View more
Jul 29 2024
1:07 AM
Hi, I'm wondering about the Meraki software Vulnerability. I mean when a Vulnerability is published what are the method to be informed in addition to the dashboard? If I set up the Upgrade window in the dashbord, will the scheduling upgrade set automatically afther the vulnerability is published? thank you
... View more
May 11 2023
5:11 AM
Ok no UTM but routing and L4 firewall are necessity. Anyway now I've all my on prem networks connected to the Azure site throught vMX auto vpn tunnel. I can establish connetion from on prem clients to the Azure resources but I cannot establish connection from Azure resourses to my on prem devices. Seems that vMX doesn't route the traffic from Azure to the on prem network. Is this expected too?
... View more
May 5 2023
8:34 AM
Dear all, I've a vMX deployment in Azure and i need to use it as default gateway for the vnet connected. I mean that the vMX have to be the security gateway for internet access for the VMs attached at the vnet. I've set up the vMX following this guide: https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/MX_Installation_Guides/vMX_Setup_Guide_for_Microsoft_Azure and on Azure routing table I've set 0.0.0.0/0 and next hope the vMX ip but it doesn't work. Can you please clarify if this configuration is supported? Thank you
... View more
© 2026 Cisco Systems, Inc.
