Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Register or Sign in
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About Anthonize
Community Record
7
Posts
0
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
Nov 27 2020
4:31 PM
I haven’t got any technical explanation other than same thing relating. Non of the firewalls participate any STP, But they still recommend a dedticated link. Only thing I can think of is, since heartbeats run on VRRP it might need some kind of fabric to pass IGMP. If they required LAN due to avoid STP convergence issue , I would think there are other important things to worry about first.
... View more
Nov 27 2020
10:38 AM
Hello, I know this topic had been talked over here a couple of times. But I really didn't get what technical reason behind it. I have two MX250 , failover is connected via a passive P2P fiber connection, and its working and tried a couple of failover scenarios and it worked. According to Maraki, the best practice is, MX Failover links must traverse through a switch or stack of switches. Cisco highly recommends for all their Faiovers to have P2P passive connection if applicable. So it will eliminate additional hop to troubleshoot. I called Maraki Support this morning for something else and personnel said they don't even bother to troubleshoot HA pair issues if it's not followed by Meraki best practices. My questions are, 1. Why Meraki is discouraging to have P2P for failover/heartbeat VRRP connection? What advantage do we have especially when it's working with passive connection? 2. If switching infrastructure (as per Meraki) is not available, and passive P2P is not allowed what would be the next solution? 3. How to convince Meraki support personnel to think out the guide book and troubleshoot the issue? Thought of picking great minds here. Thanks in advance.
... View more
Nov 12 2020
10:12 AM
VRFs more likely available in L3 devices. I don't have my hopes up Meraki will introduce vrf on to their MX series. If they can it will be nice as well. What I'm refferring something you will see the traditional Cisco ASA feature you can create different zones so you can handle routing pretty easily.
... View more
Nov 12 2020
8:07 AM
@Chris_M Thank you. Yes, I'm aware of this. But unfortunately, I have to advertise the default route due to web traffic must flow through S2S.
... View more
Nov 12 2020
7:49 AM
Hello, I have two mx250s. As of now it serves as S2S full tunnel vpns. I would like to terminate other network infrastructure to that but I cannot due to lack of zoning capabilities. If we have some zoning feature, then we should be able to create some static routes based on zones instead of one global routes. I'm not sure it's under construction. If not something to think about it. Anthonize
... View more
Dec 6 2017
10:46 AM
Thanks Chris. I was looking for this small check mark for days. 🙂
... View more
Dec 6 2017
9:05 AM
Hello All, I have STS vpn connection between MX64W (spoke) and MX84 (Hub). I advertise only specific routes from the hu to the spoke,but I get the default route from the hub as well. How can stop transmitting default route to the spoke? Thanks in advance. Anthonize
... View more
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
