- About C3SGInc
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
C3SGInc
Here to help
Member since Dec 5, 2017
04-16-2019
Community Record
13
Posts
1
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
03-14-2019
05:26 AM
I would agree that would be an option. In this case is was not identified as a need. The ISP and bandwidth that they have is not what I would consider worthy of hosting anything, so a policy was put it place that any tenants that required inbound access beyond VPN would need to obtain that service on their own.
... View more
10-17-2018
01:18 PM
Thanks for the quick reply and the detailed information, very, very helpful. Are you on a pay as you go plan or an EA agreement? Thanks again, I have reached out to every internal Meraki person I know and none have been able to shed any light on the subject.
... View more
10-17-2018
11:18 AM
Working with a client that currently has some servers running in Azure. We currently have a site to site VPN set up and working, but it is only between the main office and Azure, the remote locations cannot reach it. They are wanting to change that by installing the vMX100 in their Azure instance. While it is easy to understand the Meraki licensing cost for the vMX, we have no idea what to expect the Azure costs to be. So, I am curious if anyone that has this set up can tell me what the licensing model is that they are using and what it is costing them monthly? Of course this will ultimately depend on how much traffic is going through it, so if you can estimate that or describe how you are using it, it will really help us to understand the long terms costs. Thanks
... View more
Labels:
02-26-2018
06:48 AM
The environment is such that there are shared resources like conference rooms, copy rooms, training room and etc. So they need to be able to move about. One thought that I had was to use logons with group policy, but for some strange reason, Meraki does not support assigning GP to Meraki authenticated users.
... View more
02-23-2018
05:07 AM
Adam, That is the same process I was thinking on the wired side. Do you also have wireless? If so, how are you overlaying that? Thanks
... View more
02-22-2018
02:11 PM
Okay, that is close to where I was thinking about going. But, I felt that I would create a user account for each tenant as assign the GP based on logon. That way they can get connected per tenant without management intervention. Maybe use VLANs on switch ports then assign VLAN per GP on the wireless. Again, trying to keep hassle down for both the end users and the managers.
... View more
02-22-2018
02:05 PM
That would then require that every tine they brought in a new device, we would have to locate it and assign it to their specific GP?
... View more
02-22-2018
01:58 PM
Can't really completely isolate then as it is not necessarily one tenant to one port. Also, it appears there are some limitations to which ports and crossing stack boundaries. Thanks for the idea though. Never really considered that one.
... View more
02-22-2018
01:53 PM
With this solution they would need to create either individual user accounts or at least one account per tenant, correct?
... View more
02-22-2018
01:24 PM
1 Kudo
Looking for suggestions. I have a client that has a multi-tenant building. They have Meraki everything, switches, access points and firewall. They want to be able to isolate traffic between tenants for both wired and wireless with the least amount of intervention possible. Note that there are too many individual clients to give each a separate SSID, Ideas? Thanks
... View more
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3919 |
