Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About ikkyu
ikkyu
Just browsing
Member since Jan 25, 2019
Apr 13 2023
Community Record
4
Posts
0
Kudos
0
Solutions
Jan 26 2019
5:17 AM
Really? So just to confirm.... currently the catalyst have the default config and are connected as access ports to the 250. No links between the switches, trunks or stp needed and no loop will occur? It really would make things easier if that's the case. Thank you for your reply.
... View more
Jan 26 2019
4:46 AM
Really? So just to confirm.... currently the catalyst have the default config and are connected as access ports to the 250. No links between the switches, trunks or stp needed and no loop will occur? It really would make things easier if that's the case. Thank you for your reply.
... View more
Jan 26 2019
4:45 AM
Really? So just to confirm.... currently the catalyst have the default config and are connected as access ports to the 250. No links between the switches, trunks or stp needed and no loop will occur? It really would make things easier if that's the case. Thank you for your reply. @PhilipDAth
... View more
Jan 26 2019
2:40 AM
HI, I currently have a single mx250 and 3 catalyst switches connected via access ports each running separate VLANs. The switches have no config and are not linked directly to each other and are not stackable. If I want to introduce a 2nd mx for HA what is the best way to do this. I can config the switches with the vlans and the uplink ports to trunk with the remaining ports as access to end devices but according to the documentation the switches need to be also linked. If this was the case would STP not kick in a stop the VRRP packets from passing between the MXs?
... View more
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
