Meraki

LB3 · ‎May 12 2019

Thanks! Sounds good, but in this setup what's the best way to handle the handoff. I have a /29. If I connect MX1 to Core Switch 1, and MX2 to Core Switch 2 could/should I still setup the MX's in a master/passive setup with a VIP between the two?

LB3 · ‎May 11 2019

We have a large client that had a limited budget so the switches purchased are not idea for a client their size and the industry they are in but the Cap Ex hit is making us implement and design with what they have. The client has: (2) MX84 (7) MS120-48LP (1) MS120-24LP (12) AP's With the MS120's only supporting Virtual Stacking what is the best way to design the network with redundancy in mind. My thought is to designate two of the switches as uplink/distribution type switches and uplink each additional switch to those with one port in each and then have the two "distribution" switches uplink to both MX's individually? Any thoughts or suggestions? Am I overcomplicating the setup?

Meraki

Community

About LB3

LB3

LaMarr

Community Record

Badges

Re: Optimizing Network Design with underpowered gear.

Optimizing Network Design with underpowered gear.