Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About rickibiza
rickibiza
New here
Member since Feb 5, 2025
Online
Community Record
4
Posts
0
Kudos
0
Solutions
6 hours ago
Yeah, that's a shame. Losing the redundancy the vpn is not 100%reliable. Thanks a lot, I'll find another solution, maybe skipping the load balancer.
... View more
9 hours ago
ok thank you! In this case I don't have any redundancy in case of problem on that public ip (router issues) and that's might be a big problem.
... View more
12 hours ago
I'm not sure if I get it right: if I choose one ip public I can just use one of my routers. If it fails the VPN will be down. There is no failover with this method. Thanks
... View more
12 hours ago
Hello, I'm setting up a site to site vpn between two networks under the same organization. The site A has the 2 MX WANs directly connected to the 2 router meanwhile the site B has the WAN port connected to a load balancer and the load balancer is connected to the 4 routers we have. I have this error on the site B "This WAN appliance is behind a VPN-unfriendly NAT, which can be caused by upstream load balancers or strict firewall rules." The network configuration in the site B is : I open the ports I need for my services on the 4 routers, the load balancer has a port forwarding for ALL the ports (1-65535)to the MX. I reckon there is something that the auto vpn site to site doesn't like. Someone could help me please? Thanks a lot!
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Auto VPN
© 2025 Cisco Systems, Inc.
