@NJacobe did you ever get this issue resolved? I am experiencing a similar issue with my Informacast Paging and Meraki Switches.   Thanks! ... View more

Thanks for the updates @NJacobe it sounds like we've collectively ruled out everything we can, time for a case, let us know what it turns out to be.  I agree it's especially odd the uplink is being held to 20Mbps, almost sounds like the typical asymmetrical traffic shaping many ISPs use, but when you bypass the MX it's gone, yet the MX had no traffic shaping rules in place.  One last thing - we didn't overlook a group policy did we?  The MX firewall and traffic shaping page might not have any settings, also make sure you're client isn't being tied to a GP that might be enforcing limits. ... View more

Excellent, glad it went well 👍 ... View more

Are you sure the device finished upgrading and rebooted? If so, then at this point you might want to contact Meraki support. Maybe if they move your ORG to a new node it might improve? But if its happening on LOCAL LAN / same switch then I'm not sure at this point. ... View more

I would imagine it is as simple as factory resetting the devices and then re-enrolling them in the Google System.   You will of course have to set it up on the Google side. ... View more

HI, we would like to load balance/failover using 2 x MX100's via two separate ISP's. Is this possible ??   I have used Radware load balances in the distant dark ages and this was one of their key functions. I am hoping the MX can do the same by using a virtual IP shared across both units with intelligence to perform load balancing via the separate ISP's.   Cheers ... View more

Static DHCP reservations will be maintained.   I don't think that dynamic DHCP will be.  Expect that to be lost.   Something that catches a lot of people out is the MS250 only has 10Gbe SFP+ ports.  So if you want to plug in a copper circuit make sure you get a copper SFP. ... View more

Yup. If that fits your use case you can certainly do that.  ... View more