Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About amabt
amabt
Building a reputation
Member since Nov 8, 2021
Thursday
Community Record
106
Posts
28
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
Jul 4 2023
9:31 PM
We've had many cases where MG go offline for no apparent reasons. Forcing a reboot via PoE it comes back on right away.
... View more
Jul 4 2023
7:34 PM
Cancel that. Just got him to check his access again and now its working! No idea why or how. AFAIK no changes made on our end.
... View more
Jul 4 2023
6:21 PM
We are using MSP mode. We have an odd issue where one of our tech who was able to access all Org for for a long time, is now unable to access once of the Meraki Org. Simply does not show in the MSP Org Drop down. We've tried checking he is in the relevant group like other users who are not having issues. Remove and re-add him etc. This has no efect. We've lodged a case with Meraki support and they've been no help, after taking ages to come back to us and sugest changing things that makes no sense (changing SAML url, that would have effected all users). Posting this here hoping someone might have come across this and can provide some clue? Thanks
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Administrators
Jul 4 2023
5:20 PM
2 Kudos
Thanks all. We currently only have Hub sites not in template. Looks like we are going to have to unbound some sites from the Template and use them as test sites going forward.
... View more
Jul 4 2023
3:56 PM
We are evaluating options to bring our devices that are all in a Full stack template to the latest stable firmware with hundreds of networks. Since we are using template this means when an upgrade is applied to the template all devices atatched to it are going to be upgraded in one hit. If there is an uncaught test case then we potentialy has many sites that we have to deal with at the same time. How do we best stage rollout so that only a subset of sites in the template network are upgraded at any one time to minimise any impacts? I can't see any option here. Removing devices from the template is not a viable option here. Seeking everyone input on how you are doiing it? Thanks.
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Firmware Upgrades
Jul 4 2023
3:50 PM
Creating a test / dummy org is your only choice here. If you have such a large network that you can do CD/CI then your org should be in a position to have some dedicated lab equipment.
... View more
Jul 3 2023
9:12 PM
Yes thats my exact question!
... View more
Jul 3 2023
8:16 PM
What the backed?
... View more
Jul 2 2023
3:09 PM
Its not the Top X usage that we care about. Its the constant alert that device X has high usage thats causing unessary noise in alerting.
... View more
Jun 29 2023
9:56 PM
Unfortunately the cameras are not Meraki and they are spread all over different different physical switch.
... View more
Jun 29 2023
6:42 PM
Thank you. That should get me started!
... View more
Jun 29 2023
5:19 PM
That looks great. This is something I would love to do but lacking the skill to do it. Would you mind sharing the code for this? Thanks
... View more
Jun 29 2023
5:00 PM
We have many sites with CCTV devices which as expected generate high amount of traffic. we've setup an alert to notify us of any devices with unexpected high usage. Issue is we keep getting alerted for the CCTV NVR / Cameras. Which we already know and want to exclude them from those alerts. Meraki support sugest we whitelist them. As I understand it, whitelisting has side effect that it will ignore firewall rules etc. Whats the best way to set specific devices to be ignored for high traffic usage so we don't keep getting them (effectively false alarm for us). I tried looking at the Network Group Policies. However this does not seem have any option there to ignore high traffic alert. Thanks
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Traffic Analytics
Jun 15 2023
10:53 PM
Scratch that 5.0.02075 seems to fix the code execution issue. However, when does Meraki release line up wiht Cisco ones ussualy?
... View more
Jun 15 2023
10:28 PM
Looks like Cisco has release Cisco Secure Client 5.0.03072 to fix the CVE. However Meraki portal only show the last version Secure Client v5.0.02075 for Windows. How do we get our hands on 5.0.03072? BTW the official Cisco page also only shows v5.0.02075 https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/security/secure-client-5/model.html#~tab-downloads
... View more
Jun 14 2023
4:23 PM
Thanks. I was hopping to not need something like that. We have hundreds of networks so that going to be lots of API calls!
... View more
Jun 13 2023
10:58 PM
I need to get a list off all devices across an org that have been manualy set to "Allow list (no bandwidth limits or splash page)". I can't seem find a relevant an API endpoint. Something like one of the below endpoints for would be good get-network-client-policy Thanks
... View more
May 25 2023
9:59 PM
Check out this endpoint https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/#!update-device Keep in mind that the notes field has a length limit.
... View more
May 23 2023
4:26 PM
Any we have the next problem. The cellular provider is blocking ICMP to their 4G service! UNless there is a way to do it via Meraki I'm stuck!
... View more
May 23 2023
3:46 PM
They are all AutoVPN. However, 4G does not seem to generate any traffic even through its online and showing an IP address. Hence my issue. I'm playing with #!get-organization-appliance-uplink-statuses to get the 4G IPs Looks like pinging it is the only viable solutions. It would be nice if the uplink link monitoring can also be done for the 4G as it doesn't generate much traffic.
... View more
May 22 2023
7:22 PM
We have many MX67 that has a 4G dongle with a Data SIM. They act as the backup connection. The way things are, they do not kick in (aka generate any traffic) unless the main WAN1 fails. We have an issue where our records are not very good and we need to audit if a Data Sim is still in active use. We suspect they are in the MX dongle. However because they do not generate any traffic. We cannot confirm if they are active and also where the last cell tower is (the telco can do a report if there are some traffic). Also they are tied to a tempate so we cannot just adhoc force some traffic through the 4G. Is there any endpoint in the API that we can use to force the cellular at some schedule interval (maybe once a week) so it shows as being "alive". Best solution I can come up with so far is maybe cycle though all the MXs and grab the cellular IP and then ping it externaly to make it reply and hence some traffic? Anyone got a better suggestion?
... View more
May 9 2023
3:53 PM
https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/#!get-network-wireless-client-count-history seem to have what you are after if you filter by device serial.
... View more
May 2 2023
5:09 PM
1 Kudo
I want to create a custom app: to monitor and alert us when a WAN link is "up" (the interface it lit) but has no IP address. It is effectively down. However Meraki does not alert it as being down at present (AKAIK).
... View more
May 1 2023
7:39 PM
Yup, you can definately do to Excell as well if that work better. What would be better is being able to graph the output (using python) like how the Dashboard does it, with the higher resolution. My python skill is lacking in this area.
... View more
May 1 2023
3:00 PM
1 Kudo
Full working code import meraki
import os
import pandas as pd
from datetime import datetime
"""
Script to extract the last 30 days of packet loss and latency for a Meraki Gateway device (by serial) and save to a CSV
"""
# Get environment variables API Key
API_KEY = os.getenv('MERAKI_API_KEY')
dashboard = meraki.DashboardAPI(API_KEY, output_log=False, suppress_logging=True)
serial = 'XXXX-XXXX-XXXX' #Serial of the device we need to get the information for
ip = '8.8.8.8' #P being monitored by Meraki Dashboard
#Get data for last 31 days for wan1 with 60 seconds resolution
timespan = 2678400 #period (31 days in seconds) to get the information for. Max of 31 days.
#Get packet loss and latency history at 60 seconds resolution
device_loss_latency_history = dashboard.devices.getDeviceLossAndLatencyHistory(serial, ip, timespan=timespan, resolution=60, uplink="wan1")
#Uncomment below line to print the result to console.
#print(response_loss_latency_history)
current_time_str = datetime.now().strftime("%Y-%m-%d-%H-%M-%S")
filename = f"lost-latency-history-{serial}--{current_time_str}.csv"
#Convert to DataFrame
df_loss_latency_history = pd.DataFrame(device_loss_latency_history)
#Export it to a CSV
df_loss_latency_history.to_csv(filename, index=False, header=True)
print(f"Exported [{serial}] Packet Loss History ==> {filename}")
#Now we have a CSV file with the packet loss and latency info
... View more
- « Previous
- Next »
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 253 | |
| 2 | 293 | |
| 2 | 611 | |
| 2 | 1818 | |
| 2 | 4123 |
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
