To remove a device from the list(クライアントリストから端末を削除したい)

Emma_M
Comes here often

To remove a device from the list(クライアントリストから端末を削除したい)

whitelistedに登録した機器を処分したため、クライアントリストから削除したいです。
削除の手順についてご教示いただけますでしょうか。

I have disposed of a device registered in whitelisted and would like to remove it from my client list.
What is the procedure for deletion?

4 Replies 4
alemabrahao
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

It is not possible to remove it manually, but if it remains inactive for a while it will eventually disappear from the client list. What you can do is block it if you wish.

I am not a Cisco Meraki employee. My suggestions are based on documentation of Meraki best practices and day-to-day experience.

Please, if this post was useful, leave your kudos and mark it as solved.
Emma_M
Comes here often

Thank you for letting us know.
How long does it take to be removed?

alemabrahao
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

Check the log retention documentation.

 

https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Privacy_and_Security/Cloud_Data_Retention_Po...

I am not a Cisco Meraki employee. My suggestions are based on documentation of Meraki best practices and day-to-day experience.

Please, if this post was useful, leave your kudos and mark it as solved.
MyHomeNWLab
A model citizen

I will answer in Japanese.

メニュー: Network-wide > Clients より Clients 文字の右側にある all を all clients with a policy にすると、未接続のものも表示されると思います。

 

試しに私が適当な例示用MACアドレスで登録した際は、新しい画面だと表示されなかったので、
古い画面 (Try new version = Old version)で確認しました。

ログの保持期間は過ぎてると思いますが、この方法で設定として残ってるかを確認されるのが良いかなと。

 

Finding All Clients with Custom Device Policies - Cisco Meraki Documentation
https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Cross-Platform_Content/Finding_All_Clients_w...

> The resulting list will include all client devices that have ever had a device policy applied (including clients older than a month old, and manually-created clients that have never been seen on the network😞

 

MyHomeNWLab_0-1708428621000.png

 

Get notified when there are additional replies to this discussion.