It comes down to frequency and wavelength. For a low frequency signal, there will not be any impact to an RF signal from water in the air. The signal will penetrate the water droplets and continue on their journey. Now as the frequency increases, and wavelength decreases, the impact of humidity will be more and more. At some point the wavelength will become so short that even the water molecules (not droplets) will have an impact to the RF signal. But these are most likely in the very high frequency range. I've seen demos where mmWave signals had trouble penetrating enery-efficient windows simply due to the mateal coating on the glass.
For any noticeable effect, I seem to recall you'd have to be well above 10 GHz.
If you are walking around in the forest during a heavy rainfall, you'll most likely also have some impact on an RF signal, due to attentuation and re-/diffraction. But I'd argue that this is mostly negligeable and if at all mostly due to the foliage, rather than humiditiy.
Does water in the air impact an RF signal? Yes. But like @GreenMan notes, is the impact noticeable? Arguably no.
If you're trying to wirelessly stream Netflix while 20ft under water, you're probably going to have a bad time.
The wireless coverage is not impacted by a very humid environment in your office. If you need wireless coverage in a humid setting, you might want to look towards an outdoors or ruggedized AP, but these are more for cooled warehouses, freezers etc.
LinkedIn :::
https://blog.rhbirkelund.dk/Like what you see? - Give a Kudo ## Did it answer your question? - Mark it as a Solution
🙂All code examples are provided as is. Responsibility for Code execution lies solely your own.