Meraki Routing priority

[Yasuomi]

Hi,

Current,
The environment is constructed with non-meraki vpn peer.
One non-meraki vpn peer sets the Private Subnet to 0.0.0.0/0.

When you check the routing, the priority is like this.

As a result, no routing to the ASA is performed,
Communication to ASA is also going to Palo Alto.

What is the priority for this?
Is this expected behavior?

[DensyoV]

Hi,

Based on your route table, if the destination IP matches the 192.168.X.0/24 network then the traffic should be routed to ASA. However, if it does not match and falls under the default route 0.0.0.0/0 then it will go to the Palo Alto because it has a higher priority than the default route over the WAN connection.

If you suspect that the traffic is not routing over the IPsec even if it matches the 192.168.X.0/24 destination subnet, then you may need to call Meraki support so they can check whether this is the case or not.

Hope this helps. 

[Yasuomi · Accepted solution]

Even if it matches 192.168.x.0 / 24, it is not routed to the ASA.

Contact Meraki support.

Thank you very much.