MX84 with BGP Protocol

Solved
Claudio_AAA
Here to help

MX84 with BGP Protocol

Hi All,

We´re working in a project, where the customer have 02 ISP providers (they are an autonomous system)

My question is: can I connect  the 02 links directly on MX84 configured with BGP protocol or, must I have to connect a front end Router, such as a ISR4331 (see attached topology)?

Best Regards,

Claudio Arriagada
2A TIBGP-AS_Load_Balancing-v1.jpg

 

 

1 Accepted Solution
PhilipDAth
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

First, the MX BGP support is only for AutoVPN routes, so it can't be used for this scenario:

https://documentation.meraki.com/MX-Z/Networks_and_Routing/BGP

So assuming you have your own public prefix and public ASN, you are probably going to want to use the 4331 and have it do the BGP for you.

 

The other alternative is to not use BGP.  To simply have each ISP statically route your public prefix down the respective circuit, and to distribute this static prefix into BGP at each of their ends.

Then you can use the MX load balancing option to control which circuit is being used.

https://documentation.meraki.com/MX-Z/Firewall_and_Traffic_Shaping/MX_Load_Balancing_and_Flow_Prefer...

 

 

Using the 4331 will give you the most control - by far.  I would probably go with the 4331 option if it was me.

View solution in original post

8 Replies 8
Uberseehandel
Kind of a big deal

Is that O2 land line ISP or LTE ISP service? It makes a difference.

Robin St.Clair | Principal, Caithness Analytics | @uberseehandel

Could you explain about O2 land line ISP and LTE ISP service?

Claudio

 

In some countries O2 offers a fixed line service such as - https://www.o2.co.uk/business/products/broadband/high-speed-internet 

also there is the mobile LTE service - https://www.o2.co.uk/shop/inspire/mobile-broadband-explained#section4 

The maximum speeds available depend upon country and location within that country. 

Robin St.Clair | Principal, Caithness Analytics | @uberseehandel

Hi Robin,

the two links of the customer are dedicated (fixed line services), with BGP protocol.

Each link is 100Mbps, and different ISP´s.

We´re plannig to change the actual equipments (linux based) to MX84 and ISR4331 (cisco router), like the topology.

 

regards

 

Claudio Arriagada

 

PhilipDAth
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

First, the MX BGP support is only for AutoVPN routes, so it can't be used for this scenario:

https://documentation.meraki.com/MX-Z/Networks_and_Routing/BGP

So assuming you have your own public prefix and public ASN, you are probably going to want to use the 4331 and have it do the BGP for you.

 

The other alternative is to not use BGP.  To simply have each ISP statically route your public prefix down the respective circuit, and to distribute this static prefix into BGP at each of their ends.

Then you can use the MX load balancing option to control which circuit is being used.

https://documentation.meraki.com/MX-Z/Firewall_and_Traffic_Shaping/MX_Load_Balancing_and_Flow_Prefer...

 

 

Using the 4331 will give you the most control - by far.  I would probably go with the 4331 option if it was me.

Philip,

Thank you very much.

I´ll follow with 4331 in front of MX84

 

best regards,

 

Claudio Arriagada

MRCUR
Kind of a big deal

You'll need a router in front of the MX to run BGP. Or you could just allow the ISP's to do the BGP as @PhilipDAth suggested. 

MRCUR | CMNO #12

MRCUR,

Thanks a lot!!

regards

Claudio Arriagada

Get notified when there are additional replies to this discussion.
Welcome to the Meraki Community!
To start contributing, simply sign in with your Cisco account. If you don't yet have a Cisco account, you can sign up.
Labels