- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Impossible to add a network to a template
Hi everyone ,
it's a completely miss-understanding for me ,
When I try to add a network to a template , I got this issue :
Failed to auto-generate 1 unique subnet for VLAN 'Default': subnet pool '/24 from 172.X.X.0/16' has 0 subnets available.
But I've checked again and again and I'm sure that i still have some available network slot range.
I can create a new network without template with no issue , and configure the auto vpn on it .
I've only encountered this issue with all my templates
Can anyone give me the solution ?
best regards ,
Solved! Go to solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I've encountered this before and it has been due to a similar/bigger CIDR prefix being routed via a NMVPN peer.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Sharing these links, maybe they will help guide you.
MX Templates Best Practices
Managing Multiple Networks with Configuration Templates
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
You'll typically get that error when a hub is advertising a supernet through the VPN Local Networks section. Basically, to avoid this your hub needs more specific advertised routes that won't conflict/overlap with spoke subnets.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I already have 22 networks, some in templates,
I've already checked a lot, if there's an overlap, I can't create other networks by authorizing the new network to go up on the vpn within the same organization.
However, I can do it outside the template.
and why now?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Did you add a new hub with a subnet that overlaps with the template subnet?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
If you look in the route table:
Do you definately see "spare" routes?
Are there any other routes using a similar prefix, 172.x.x.0/24, but with a number that is different from /24?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
yes , i've some /22 and /24
but on the same 172.Y.X.0 only my X change , but i'm sure that i've a lot of slot available , it's not my first branch in a template
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I've encountered this before and it has been due to a similar/bigger CIDR prefix being routed via a NMVPN peer.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Like a default gateway 0.0.0.0/0 ? in nmvpn ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
of course , the cause was a default route 0.0.0.0/0 in my NMVPN.
I will open a ticket to the meraki support because now it's a issue for me , how to route the traffic to my Secure web gateway without it ?...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
During a maintenance window you remove the 0/0 route via the NMVPN peer, this should let you then create your networks, after which you can put the 0/0 route back in.
