- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Data Center One Armed Design and Security
I was designing a data center with Meraki's recommendation.
https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Deployment_Guides/VPN_Concentrator_Deployment_Guide
It is an one-armed VPN concentrator method which I turned on OSPF to advertise routes dynamically.
Now I just wonder if all the servers in the DC, which are on the different VLAN to Meraki MX are still protected by MX's content
One-Armed VPN Concentrator
filtering and traffic shaping.
Solved! Go to solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I would assume they are protected by the Cisco ASA in the topology.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Not really. Once an MX is in concentrator mode it'll only ever see VPN traffic that needs to pass through it. You'll still want to have another security device that catches the non-VPN traffic for policy enforcement.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
If I don't need any advanced security feature, then I will need to get a Enterprise license instead, right?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
That's what I found and it is VERY, VERY annoying. For the data center class MX, the price difference is over 10K for 5 year license.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
>You can use a separate ORG to separate the license portion but I know what you mean. It does seem silly
Not if you also want to use AutoVPN ...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Correct Phil
Was just referring to his gripe about the licensing model being ORG wide. As this was something I also found out the hard way =(
For reference if you need it @Happiman
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Tech support seems happy to know that I was wasting money when I was using the commanded design and no response after my last question.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
@Happiman You do know that you can terminate VPNs on an MX while it's in routed mode, yes? You do not have to put it in concentrator mode just to do VPN.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes, I used to use the routed mode but to make the route advertisement more dynamic with OSPF, as Meraki Recommands, I will use the concentrator mode.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
@Happiman OK, but you can also use OSPF in routed mode (as long as you don't have VLANs enabled).
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
yes but it's all about the data center design. As we all know, Meraki lacks many advanced firewall/VPN features, such as policyNAT VPN etc..., I cannot use it as I use ASA in the DC. Its role remains as an AutoVPN termination point in the data center.
