DC and DR subnets route in vpn

[SopheakMang]

Dear expert ,

i want to ask related to route flow on VPN MX ,

i have DC (VPN-CON) and DR(VPN-CON) , we also has 10 branches and peer with both DC and DR.

Everything working fine, but now we have some services that are in DR and DC don't have. so we want branches (MX spoke) access DR direct without going to DC MX(hub).

even i put local subnet 10.0.10.0/24 advertise in DR (site 2 site vpn) , Routing table at Spoke show that 10.0.10.0/24 is next hop DR-VPN , but when i do trace-route , it still go to DC MX , then go via VPN between MX DC to MX-DR.

any solution that , traffic will not to go DR direct ?

[PhilipDAth]

Have you configured the spokes to connect to both hubs?

[SopheakMang]

Dear philip,

Yes we have peer vpn to both site.

[MerakiDave]

Hi @SopheakMang it sounds like this should just be regular hub priority?  Meaning, if you take out any static routes and/or local subnets, on your "branch" MX, on the Site-to-Site VPN config page, if you have defined both hub appliances, DC and DR, in that order, just grab the 4-way arrow and drag and drop DR to be the first in the list.  Sorry if I misunderstood the question but that's what it sounded like. 

[SopheakMang]

Dear bro ,

After done packet capture , it works as my expectation. Thanks