meraki mx appliance iccid

PatrickA
Here to help

meraki mx appliance iccid

trying to get all the sim cards that are in our mx68cw devices.

 

on the 1200 +- devices I know about 400 have sim cards.

 

using this,

response = dashboard.appliance.getOrganizationApplianceUplinkStatuses( organization_id, total_pages='all' )

 

gives me about 11 or so that have iccid to a number, all others it's returning None as response for iccid.

 

what's up with that? why can't I get sim number properly? why does it return iccid None for most mx68cw?

 

 

6 Replies 6
rhbirkelund
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

How about if you try

response = dashboard.organizations.getOrganizationUplinksStatuses(
    organization_id, total_pages='all'
)
LinkedIn ::: https://blog.rhbirkelund.dk/

Like what you see? - Give a Kudo ## Did it answer your question? - Mark it as a Solution 🙂

All code examples are provided as is. Responsibility for Code execution lies solely your own.
PatrickA
Here to help

same result

rhbirkelund
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

I'm suspecting it may be because the Cellular modem isn't active (not being used). Cellular is a backup connection and won't go up unless WAN1 and WAN2 both fail.

LinkedIn ::: https://blog.rhbirkelund.dk/

Like what you see? - Give a Kudo ## Did it answer your question? - Mark it as a Solution 🙂

All code examples are provided as is. Responsibility for Code execution lies solely your own.
PatrickA
Here to help

I checked, the ones that return a iccid value, their cellular is in READY state it's not active, WAN1 is active. same goes with all the other networks with a sim card in the meraki but again most show None for iccid value.

ww
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

Is there a difference in firmware?

PatrickA
Here to help

yes this could be related to firmware it's actually what I was looking for earlier... the ones that work are in the 17.xx version I'll update few of the ones that give me None to 17.x see if they show iccid number after upgrade.

Get notified when there are additional replies to this discussion.