First question, is the second ISP only connected to the active MX ?
If so, okay. But consider that in case one of the MXes fails, wouldn't it be better to have a link on each MX ?
The /29 is necessary because the /30 only provides two usable IPs, in this case the gateway and its MX. Since each MX needs an IP (ideally), you need at least one /29.
I am not a Cisco Meraki employee. My suggestions are based on documentation of Meraki best practices and day-to-day experience.
Please, if this post was useful, leave your kudos and mark it as solved.