APs in different timezones under same Org

Solved
Jeizzen
Getting noticed

APs in different timezones under same Org

Hi

 

Have a customer who has multiple sites across different timezones.

 

I have made a configuration template for quicker deployment for APs.

 

But what is happening for the firmware upgrades of the APs? Is there only 1 option for timezone choice in the configuration template?

 

Does it mean that the APs that are in GMT - 8 upgrading at 5 am, then APs in GMT -5 will upgrade at 8am

 

Is there any other way to upgrade by timezone, other than creating a configuration template for each timezone

 

 

thanks,

 

 

1 Accepted Solution
PhilipDAth
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

Go to Security & SD-WAN/General and you can override the timezone per network.

View solution in original post

5 Replies 5
PhilipDAth
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

Go to Security & SD-WAN/General and you can override the timezone per network.

Hi,

 

But as I see, there is nothing concerning the MR upgrade in the other part of this network (I've split the networks to be able to bind configuration template only for the wireless)

 

Jeizzen_0-1614087338051.png

 

 

is there something I'm misunderstanding

 

thanks,

TBHPTL
A model citizen

create a template for each timezone...

I've overriden it here for local time zone in my wireless network for a specific site X

 

Jeizzen_0-1614784311056.png

 

But in the general template it is still this:

 

Jeizzen_1-1614784492310.png

 

So:

 

Does it mean that on that specific site X, APs will upgrade Wednesday 1 am (taken from template), but @ Toronto UTC -5 time ?

 

thanks,

Jeizzen
Getting noticed

To add on my own question, a few seasons later, if it can help anyone

 

Firmware upgrade that are scheduled in a configuration template will follow the setting of the timezone that has been manually changed in the related binded networks

 

It will not follow the timezone that is set in the configuration template

Get notified when there are additional replies to this discussion.