Meraki

ChrisDonkelaar · ‎Oct 10 2018

@PhilipDAthNot at all if the VPN setup would allow local and/or peer identifiers... So, now the question is: does the MX allow you to set up identifiers on the VPN?

ChrisDonkelaar · ‎Oct 3 2018

Thank you for your aswer and that extra article @jdsilva, explains a lot and is extremely usefull for future reference. I'll set up a PoC to make sure it works as intended, and will give you the Kudo's once it does 😉 Regards, Chris

ChrisDonkelaar · ‎Oct 3 2018

Thanks for your reply Ajit. I completely agree with you about possibilities with 4G. For now it's more that we have static routes set up in the MX for the networks in the DC. So, there need to be multiple static routes to the same destination, that can be used when the MPLS connection fails (As in the MPLS Failover to Meraki Auto VPN article). And I'm wondering if that's possible with the VPN being non-auto, to non-Meraki peer.

ChrisDonkelaar · ‎Oct 3 2018

Goodday, We have the following situation. Our customer is connecting it's MX84 to our DC over MPLS. Besides the MPLS it has a normal fibre internet connection for traffic going outside. Since the company is located in a high density city area where huge infrastructure work is beginning with a lot of digging, they want to secure themselves for being cut off when the work hits some fibre. So, they are wondering if they can use 4G Cellular as a backup for there MPLS line. I'm referencing to the MPLS Failover to Meraki Auto VPN, but since there is no MX in our DC but an other VPN solution, my question is if this is still possible? So, to be short, is it possible to use a Meraki-to-non-Meraki VPN over 4G as a possible failover for the MPLS connection? Best regards, Chris Donkelaar

Meraki

Community

About ChrisDonkelaar

ChrisDonkelaar

Community Record

Badges

Re: MPLS Failover to non-auto VPN

Re: MPLS Failover to non-auto VPN

Re: MPLS Failover to non-auto VPN

MPLS Failover to non-auto VPN

Re: MPLS Failover to non-auto VPN