Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About Trabel
Trabel
Getting noticed
Member since Feb 6, 2020
Apr 1 2020
Community Record
27
Posts
3
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
Mar 5 2020
12:36 PM
Thank you and yes, I've gone through all of that. The Cameras are free to talk to Meraki through the firewall. I see no block actions in the event log. Why is it that the cameras would be switching status? I disabled the port for the camera that was in a connected state. Then the other went from alerting to connected. When I re-enabled the port for the disabled camera, they switched alert statuses again. Why would it do that? Also when it does this, the camera that's alerting a bad connection is not showing any historical recording.
... View more
Mar 4 2020
3:08 PM
The Meraki connected to our private network and passes through our security appliances to get to the internet. I have rules in place to allow the Meraki network to go out to the required Meraki IP addresses... Both show allow actions for all camera's and the Meraki switch going out.
... View more
Mar 3 2020
8:06 AM
It says the same for both... yet they both are able to connect to the cloud without issue. Gateway warning (bad connectivity to Dashboard, possible firewall or NAT issue) (starting Mar 2 10:51)
... View more
Mar 2 2020
11:51 AM
Got it, What if the footage gap was growing? I've also noticed when I cycle the port on the Switch, the two cameras swap status. Is this normal?
... View more
Mar 2 2020
10:40 AM
Mar 2 2020
10:18 AM
Ok, the streaming directly to your workstation while on the local network... is this irregardless of the static route on the PC? Are those really needed? I'm also having issues with the cameras showing historical footage. It's not consistent.
... View more
Mar 2 2020
9:59 AM
1 Kudo
Thank you. That makes more sense. So I should still be allowed to view stored footage on the camera that way without the cloud proxy?
... View more
Mar 2 2020
9:08 AM
I have an MS120 and a few Meraki cameras connected to it. I want to have users access the local camera feeds without using the cloud portal. I do see in the Meraki documentation that Local access is possible when you add a static route to the cameras on the PC you wish to view them on. I have done that but I still can't web to either camera. Is there another way? Below is the article from the Meraki Website Local Access If the client has an IP route to the private IP address of the camera, a secure connection will be established between the two. This occurs when the client is either on the LAN, over site-to-site VPN or client VPN. In the LAN scenario, no WAN bandwidth is used for the video streaming. Direct streaming is indicated by a green check mark in the bottom left corner of the video stream.
... View more
Feb 28 2020
6:34 AM
Thank you for the detailed update! I have opened all necessary access to the IP's and ports recompensed by Meraki. The 5228-5230 one that was just noted earlier that doesn't make any sense as the camera IP's show zero attempts at reaching it in my firewall event log. TCP8890 and NTP are the only ones getting blocked. Only one of the two cameras have plugged in appears to be having an issue. Might be isolated to the camera itself.
... View more
Feb 28 2020
6:29 AM
Haven't done a factory reset. That may be something since only one of the two cameras is having issues. It won't ping from the dashboard but I can ping its IP on my network. With the 5228-5230 firewall port access, wouldn't I see the IP of the cameras attempting to hit it?
... View more
Feb 27 2020
1:31 PM
I'm not sure why Google Play Store is critical for the Cameras operation which seems to be what 5228-5230 is for.
... View more
Feb 27 2020
1:22 PM
I didn't see that step in any of the Meraki upstream firewall documentation. I don't see any blocks on the firewall for those ports going out accept the cameras attempting at to reach 108.161.147.44 on TCP8890.
... View more
Feb 27 2020
12:04 PM
It is periodic. It'll be orange and green.
... View more
Feb 27 2020
12:02 PM
Yes, they're getting DHCP
... View more
Feb 27 2020
11:15 AM
Thank you! Yes they are in Inventory and No they are not assigned to network or name. I added them to the network. Its showing now and they periodically have orange dots and back to green on and off.
... View more
Feb 27 2020
11:05 AM
I see them connected as Assets in the dashboard however I don't see the "Cameras" link in the left menu. I didn't see any errors.
... View more
Feb 27 2020
9:34 AM
I have two Meraki MV cameras plugged into a Meraki switch. They show intermittent connections and are not getting added to my dashboard even after "Claiming" them. Here is a clip of the logs: Feb 27 05:50:19 ac:17:c8:aa:75:c6 Port status change port: 23, old: down, new: 1Gfdx Feb 27 05:50:16 ac:17:c8:aa:75:c6 Port status change port: 23, old: 1Gfdx, new: down Feb 27 05:49:59 ac:17:c8:aa:75:c6 Port status change port: 23, old: down, new: 1Gfdx Feb 27 05:49:37 ac:17:c8:aa:75:c6 Port status change port: 23, old: 1Gfdx, new: down Feb 27 05:45:17 ac:17:c8:aa:75:c6 Port status change port: 22, old: down, new: 1Gfdx Feb 27 05:45:15 ac:17:c8:aa:75:c6 Port status change port: 22, old: 1Gfdx, new: down Feb 27 05:44:59 ac:17:c8:aa:75:c6 Port status change port: 22, old: down, new: 1Gfdx Feb 27 05:44:36 ac:17:c8:aa:75:c6 Port status change port: 22, old: 1Gfdx, new: down Feb 27 05:35:22 ac:17:c8:aa:75:c6 Port status change port: 23, old: down, new: 1Gfdx Feb 27 05:35:19 ac:17:c8:aa:75:c6 Port status change port: 23, old: 1Gfdx, new: down Feb 27 05:35:03 ac:17:c8:aa:75:c6 Port status change port: 23, old: down, new: 1Gfdx Feb 27 05:34:40 ac:17:c8:aa:75:c6 Port status change port: 23, old: 1Gfdx, new: down Feb 27 05:29:56 ac:17:c8:aa:75:c6 Port status change port: 22, old: down, new: 1Gfdx Feb 27 05:29:53 ac:17:c8:aa:75:c6 Port status change port: 22, old: 1Gfdx, new: down Feb 27 05:29:37 ac:17:c8:aa:75:c6 Port status change port: 22, old: down, new: 1Gfdx Feb 27 05:29:14 ac:17:c8:aa:75:c6 Port status change port: 22, old: 1Gfdx, new: down Feb 27 05:20:00 ac:17:c8:aa:75:c6 Port status change port: 23, old: down, new: 1Gfdx
... View more
I found the solution. Our network was able to send the private Meraki network out through our upstream firewall but our firewall didn't have a route for when the traffic came back in. Once I added that route, it worked.
... View more
Thank you for the great info. I managed to get the switch statically IP’d and am able to see it now talking on the network. Upstream the packets appear to be getting to their destined addresses. The IP the meraki has is hitting the public DNS servers I’ve given it, though I don’t see any return traffic coming back in the firewall from those DNS servers. Even though meraki’s site says it only needs outbound rules I put an inbound allow for return traffic. Basic IP Connectivity on my network shows the meraki can traverse back and forth just fine. Now that it has a static IP the Connection status page still says switch is trying to join the network.
... View more
I did a Pcap with wireshark and noticed it successfully getting a DHCP offer from the server. If I haven't mentioned before, I'm using a Cisco router as a dhcp server which the Meraki is directly connected. It appears the Meraki is getting an IP offered from the router however when going to the local status page (via the management port) it says it can't get an IP. However the router and my upstream firewall says otherwise. I noticed the "Unreachable" packets and am investigating that.
... View more
I see successful requests to the public DNS server I have it pointed to via event traffic in our firewall. So it's getting out fine. Tried doing a p-cap on the interface its uplinked with and it never completes. P-Cap results: --- Start Of Stream --- --- End Of Stream --- Also getting this error now... it appears every now and then. But my DHCP server shows a successful bind. "Bad IP assignment configuration"
... View more
Now that I got the VLAN tagging right... I'm getting a DNS server error. I'm using active public DNS servers though in the DHCP configuration. I even see the Meraki switch going out and making DHCP calls to that IP successfully. Any ideas?
... View more
Yes Blake, I built out my firewall rules and NAT based on that article. I only however added rules for ports 80, 443, 7351, 7734, 7752... to test. I didn't think I'd need the camera proxy yet. I did add the rule for 8.8.8.8 for ICMP but it didn't change anything.
... View more
I have given it access to the Meraki DNS IP's and that didn't seem to do anything
... View more
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 9490 | |
| 1 | 8371 |
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
