cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Are the MR53E's just not that good?

SOLVED
Highlighted
Here to help

Are the MR53E's just not that good?

Hi all, 

 

We have a few MR53E's and the performance on these are absolutely terrible. I have worked with Meraki at some length but not really getting anywhere with it. Capping out 5ghz at 289mbps with stub antennas. Any ideas or is this normal?Screen Shot 2019-08-22 at 12.06.36 PM.png

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Highlighted
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

Re: Are the MR53E's just not that good?

12 REPLIES 12
Highlighted
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

Re: Are the MR53E's just not that good?

Stub antennas are usually only a fraction of a wavelength, have you tried with the normal 6" ones that should be better?

Highlighted
Here to help

Re: Are the MR53E's just not that good?

Sorry I meant the 6" dipole adjustable not the stubs my mistake.

Highlighted
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

Re: Are the MR53E's just not that good?

Looking at one of the antenna's datasheet, the lead comment is as below:

 

Dipole (MA-ANT-3-A5/6)
The Dipole antenna is ideal for low ceiling installations where wall penetration or extended reach are important. Some example uses are low-density deployments like schools and hotels to provide basic low-performance connectivity. These types of best effort deployments usually have APs installed in the hallway to cover adjacent rooms.

Highlighted
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

Re: Are the MR53E's just not that good?

Okay, they should be much better, sorry posts crossed over...

Highlighted
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

Re: Are the MR53E's just not that good?

Highlighted
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

Re: Are the MR53E's just not that good?

Which antennas are they, the bendy dipole ones on the datasheet are 3" including the bend so I don't think they'll be much better than the stubs, I couldn't see a decent 6" one.  That could well be the problem...

Highlighted
Here to help

Re: Are the MR53E's just not that good?

I've tried overriding this and adjusting the RF profiles but the 53e's default back to that.

Highlighted
Here to help

Re: Are the MR53E's just not that good?

That could potentially be it. Switching to a wide patch could resolve this I'd imagine. Or just upgrading to the 55's.

Kind of a big deal

Re: Are the MR53E's just not that good?

@ww is 100% correct here. The data rate you're hitting is the max for a 20MHz channel, which is pretty impressive actually. 

Highlighted
Kind of a big deal

Re: Are the MR53E's just not that good?

This as good as it gets really when your using 20MHz, and Macbooks are 3 stream capable too, so yeah, its awesome not bad. MCS9 is 'better' but not by much.

 

http://mcsindex.com/

 

Scroll down until you see 234 in the 20MHz column, light blue color for 802.11ac rates

Nolan Herring | nolanwifi.com
TwitterLinkedIn
Highlighted
Kind of a big deal

Re: Are the MR53E's just not that good?

Try using 40Mhz wide channels if the environment is not to dense.

Highlighted
Here to help

Re: Are the MR53E's just not that good?

Good call there. I switched it manually in the RF profiles to 80 obviously losing coverage area but hit that correct speed.

Welcome to the Meraki Community!
To start contributing, simply sign in with your Cisco account. If you don't yet have a Cisco account, you can sign up.